Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Open Question: Green Tech. Energy replacements. Do you have the answer?


1. To try to reduce the federal budget deficit, Clinton supported (1 point)
eliminating the Social Security program.
lowering taxes on the wealthy.
increasing government spending.
cutting spending and raising taxes.
2. Clinton won reelection in 1996, helped by (1 point)
his support of the Contract with America.
a steadily improving economy.
victory in the Persian Gulf War.
strong support from Republicans.
3. Which of these caused problems for Clinton during his second term? (1 point)
economic recession
high unemployment
scandals
huge budget deficits
4. Who decided the outcome of the 2000 presidential election? (1 point)
the people
the candidates
the Supreme Court
the Senate
5. In Russia and Eastern Europe during the 1990s, the United States promoted (1 point)
a return to communism.
a military build-up.
democracy and free enterprise.
isolationism.

Open Question: Green Tech. Energy replacements. Do you have the answer?


Many in the global warming camp warn daily that we must make changes now. That we must cut carbon emissions by 60, 70 and even some say 80% by 2050

http://april.stepitup2007.org/article.php?id=29


They mask this under the words, “its’ only 2 percent reduction per year.

So lets be honest ok? By 2010 just 2 years, what do we have to replace the 4% reduction in gas, oil or coal That is ready our ONLY source of electric power generation?
By 2015 we are now up to almost 15 % less elec being produced by coal, all the while power consumption has been increasing. What do we have and where will it is placed, with the fighting already taking place over the placement wind turbines, etc.

Please don’t waste anyone’s time talking solar. You could cover the whole southwest of the US with solar panels and still not have enough production to replace 3 percent let alone 15 pecent

So what are these green 'supper ideals', as well as where will they be built in order to reduce the emissions while at the same time Not sending us back 500 years or even worse. 500 years ago people where allowed to heat their homes and cook their food with coal or wood, you propose stopping that all together. Well apparently either no one has a real answer or they are just sitting on it. Nuclear is not an option. We know the few loud mouths won't allow it.

As far as solar, I have found nothing.



Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,